In the aftermath of a recent cyberattack, the term “conflict escalation” has come to refer to the efforts of both sides to escalate the conflict.
But is it the right thing to do?
What is the right strategy?
What can be done to prevent conflict escalation?
This article aims to answer these questions.
Read more about Conflict escalation.
Cognitive strategiesCognitive methods involve thinking about and reflecting on the conflict to develop and implement strategies to resolve it.
They’re often considered the gold standard for conflict resolution, but they’re not universally applicable, so a number of different strategies can be applied.
Cognitive strategy is the use of cognitive techniques to develop a framework to solve conflicts.
It’s the art of thinking through the problem and applying different approaches to different problems to find the best solution.
There are three types of cognitive strategies: strategic, non-strategic, and behavioural.
Strategic strategies involve planning, monitoring and assessing the impact of the conflict on both parties.
Strategies can include: taking action to protect one’s assets or property, responding to attacks on one’s infrastructure or infrastructure networks, or using social media to educate people about the risks.
Non-strategies are focused on the goals of both the parties and the consequences of their actions.
They may include: trying to resolve the conflict by other means, or moving to a more peaceful solution.
Behavioural strategies involve developing strategies to achieve the desired outcome.
Examples of behavioural strategies include: using a positive message to encourage people to think differently, or encouraging people to seek a solution that maximises their benefits and minimises the costs of the problem.
Cultural approachesThe cultural approach focuses on how a culture can be shaped by the conflict, while the political approach focuses more on the impact the conflict will have on the culture.
For example, when dealing with conflict over food, the cultural approach will focus on the benefits and costs of a fair and equitable system of trade, while a political approach will consider the costs and benefits of a political system that fails to provide the benefits of trade.
Read about cultural approaches and political approaches.
Cookie clicker strategiesA cookie clicker (also known as a cookie cookie, cookie click, cookie-clicker or cookie click) is a way of responding to a conflict.
It involves thinking about the situation and using cognitive tools to identify what might be useful to either side.
ConsequencesConsequentiality-based cognitive strategies are the simplest form of cognitive strategy, but there are a number that are more complex and involve more thinking.
These include: making the case for a solution to the problem, assessing the pros and cons of various options, or considering the possibility of changing behaviour to increase the chances of achieving a desired outcome for both sides.
Categorical and deliberative cognitive strategies focus on how to respond to a problem in a way that will improve the chances for both parties to achieve their goals.
Criminogenic cognitive strategies seek to understand the impact that one side’s actions have on others and to change behaviour to make them more likely to change their behaviour.
These cognitive strategies can include things like: changing the way you speak, changing the ways you dress, changing how you interact with others, or making sure people behave in a socially acceptable way.
A number of studies have looked at how these cognitive strategies might affect outcomes in conflict resolution.
Some of the studies involved participants who received money to help with their food bills.
Some studies involved people who received gifts to help them with their travel expenses.
A number of other studies examined how the participants who benefited from the cookies’ effectiveness would respond to the threat of a cyberattack.
Cigarette smoking and conflict resolutionMany studies have found that individuals who smoke more than once a week are more likely than those who smoke less to engage in conflict, and this is also the case when it comes to conflict resolution strategies.
In a study of 2,000 people, participants who had quit smoking within the past six months were more likely then those who had not to engage with conflict.
This is consistent with the research that shows that people who engage in more frequent conflict resolution activities tend to be less likely to engage more frequently in risky behaviours.
The problem is that these cognitive behavioural strategies are not universal and, as we know, some people may benefit from them, while others may not.
This article outlines how to think about and apply the cognitive strategies you use to deal with conflicts.
Read more about conflict resolution and how to cope with conflict in the article The best ways to deal With ConflictCognitive strategy is one of the best ways of dealing with conflicts, and it’s particularly effective when applied to the internet age.
Cognitive strategies are often used to help people develop strategies for dealing with a variety of issues, including the Internet, social media, and even the natural world.
CognitionCognitive thinking is not limited to the study of conflict.
Cognitive thinking can be